While looking at today’s cnn news, I found out at the bigger aspect of politics. What would that be? In my class, wears studying about the federalist parties and the anti-federalist parties in the early USA. There were the main points of John Luck and Tomas Hobbs, John Luck being the federalist and Tomas Hobbs being the anti-federalist. We see the Federalist Party in the election very clearly, but where is the anti-federalist party? There is no big anti-federalist party running in the campaign mainly because the role of president is a federalist position. Don’t get me wrong, people running for president can be leaning more towards the anti-federalist party, but if an anti federalist signs up to be president, they are breaking their own party rule by signing up for being a president and governing over millions of people. That leaves very few options for the anti-federalist party since destabilizing the government would essentially be rejecting the constitution that made this land. Going against the constitution would also be treason against the US. So freedom of speech, essentially is limited in this aspect! As well as the presidential campaign blocking out a particular party.
CNN Source
